My visit to ClosedCongress

No Comments

North Door

Regular OpenCongress users know that we lag a bit (about 24 hours) behind THOMAS, the official site of the Library of Congress, when we put bill information and roll call votes on OpenCongress. This is a result of several factors, but put simply, we have to wait for the information to be online before our servers can collect it for publication. For the vast majority of users, this system works: Congress usually moves so slowly that waiting 24 hours to read the bill text or review a roll-call vote is not much of a problem.

We do run into trouble, however, when legislation being debated in Congress is not made available online.

On Friday, my colleague John Wonderlich and I made a field trip to Capitol Hill. Our destination: the House Committee on Appropriations Subcommittee on the Legislative Branch. Our goal: pick up a copy of the FY 2010 Legislative Branch Appropriations Bill (and an accompanying committee report), which had been marked up that morning.
Continue reading…

Living the good life

No Comments

Work is work is work is work. We all do it, and though it impacts us differently, I think there are similar reactions: sometimes we love our jobs, sometimes we hate them, and most of the time we’re in between. And for me, while the cycle is usually in the upper end (I love my job), I don’t really think of it on any higher level.

And then I have days like last Thursday.

Every once in awhile, I remember that I’m living in Washington D.C., working with some of the most intelligent and dedicated people in the world, trying to make the government more responsive to our fellow citizens. Thursday was one of those days. Lemme walk you through it:

  • At 2:15, I left for the Fox News studio, where my colleague John Wonderlich was being interviewed for a Sky News on President Obama’s online town hall meeting.
  • At 3:30, we stopped in the Dirksen Building for a quick snack (I had a brownie and chocolate milk).
  • At 4 p.m., we met with two Senate staffers to discuss open government, transparency, new media, and online engagement in an Government 2.0 world.
  • At 6 (off the clock, I suppose), we joined a couple of different staffers and an technology journalist for dinner, again discussing the aforementioned topics.
  • We later walked from the restaurant, past the Capitol and the Library of Congress at dusk, to a rooftop overlooking the city. We had a couple of drinks and kept the conversation going.

Like I said, every once in awhile it hits me just how lucky I am to be doing what I do. And, in no small way, it’s because of many of you reading this blog. So, thank you very much. ((Of course, I still can’t get the stoopid CSS right – sorry about the bullet points))

So it begins

1 Comment

I’ve got my first blog post up at OpenCongress.org, where today I begin my new role as community manager. It’s a quick preview of the legislative week:

The Senate kicks off the week with a busy start, as Democratic leaders attempt to keep the caucus in line on the omnibus spending bill. In the House, a vote on D.C. voting rights legislation is probable on Tuesday, and House members may be required to approve any changes made to the omnibus spending bill. In addition, the Employee Free Choice Act will be introduced in both chambers Tuesday.

For those regular readers out there:

  1. I still work for the Sunlight Foundation. OpenCongress is a Sunlight project, and I’m pretty excited to be involved.
  2. Congresspedia is no more. It’s been moved to the OpenCongress Wiki. The new wiki is like some 70s TV show: faster, stronger, better. It’s got semantic data for exploring relationships between wiki pages, and syncs right in with bill and lawmaker pages at OpenCongress. We’re also hosting some exciting community projects — check out the 2010 RaceTracker for an example. Let me know if you want to start 0ne.
  3. Part of the transition was the addition of some new features at OpenCongress (including the new Wiki). If you’re interested in h0w Congress works, a particular piece of legislation, or anything else about the legislative process, we hope to make OpenCongress the place to go.

And, for those of you out there in the New Mexico blogosphere (or NM ex-pat space – I’m looking at you Karen and Kathy), I’m sorry I haven’t been around to link and comment lately. It’s been a crazy couple of weeks.

Week End Thoughts

No Comments

I’ve been thinking a lot about the auto bailout lately (read my post on the House passage over at PR Watch), and the GOP in particular has me confused. Senate Republicans have made incredible tactical and strategic errors in killing the proposed auto bailout. This is why:

The proposal called for the government to provide $14 billion in emergency “bridge” loans, meant to carry them (notably GM and Chrysler, though Ford was lobbying for the money in the hopes of preventing cascading industry failures) through the winter and alleviate a cash shortage. The money for the loans, as proposed, would have come from a $25 billion fund approved by Congress and and President Bush earlier this year. That fund was already set to be loaned to the domestic carmakers, to help them retool and produce more fuel-effecient vehicles.

Senate Republicans did what they know best: try to screw folk over. They called for autoworkers at the Big Three (mostly union members) to take a huge pay and benefit cut. They called on the carmakers to restructure their operations as a condition of the loans. They called on the firms to also reduce their debt burden by allowing bond holders to take equity in the companies receiving the loans.

And everybody said, “great, fine, just give us the money.” The United Auto Workers wanted to phase the paycuts in over 18-months, rather than the six months required by GOP senators, but otherwise, the Republicans managed to squeeze a huge number of concessions from the autoworkers and the domestic carmakers.

But, because the union guys weren’t ready to throw away their wages and benefits right when the recession is getting really bad, GOP senators balked at the bailout. They killed it, killed it dead. And that’s what I don’t understand.

The carmakers are going to get their money one way or another – either President Bush (struggling to do something, anything, to savlage his reputation) will tap the $700 billion TARP, or a President Obama and a Democratic Congress with larger majorities in the House and Senate will approve a deal. And you know what? The UAW and the carmakers won’t have to make anything near the same kind of concessions.

Now, I don’t know whether the automakers deserve a bailout, nor do I know whether the UAW workers should have the pay and benefits they have now (I’d refer you to this chart though). I don’t understand what  the Republicans in the Senate hoped to accomplish by killing the deal. They have nothing to show for the obstructionism: no concessions from the car makers, no concessions from the UAW, and Democrats will either get a legislative win in 2009 or they’ll get what they wanted all along: President Bush using the Wall Street money to save the Big Three.

Even worse, Republicans have also written off the Rustbelt states for good – they’ll be persona non grata for years come election season. To top it all off, the $25 billion is still there, waiting to be spent on bringing the car makers into the 21st century.

Stuff I Wrote Elsewhere

No Comments

A roundup of the leadership changes in the 111th Congress, such as I could put together:

With Democrats expanding their majorities in the House and Senate during the 2008 congressional elections, members of both parties sought to redefine the leadership structure within their respective caucuses. Some of the shuffling was predictable, while political calculation entered into consideration into other leadership campaigns. In addition, freshman members of the House and Senate were forced to take sides in their first actions in Congress, even though they have not been taken office.

H/T to John for the post title.

True Blue New Mexico

2 Comments

MSNBC has reported that all three of New Mexico’s House seats went to Democrats this year. Along with the victory by Senator Elect Tom Udall, that makes the state’s entire Congressional delegation blue in the 111th Congress.

I imagine there’ll be some heads rolling in the NM GOP in the coming months. Did they win anything this cycle?