Our friend Ezra has a great article in The American Prospect this month detailing the benefits of health care systems around the world. He touches on Canada, France, Great Britain, Germany and the U.S. Veterans Health Administration (VHA), showing that each system spends less on care than the U.S. as a whole, all while providing quality care:
Putting aside the VHA, America’s annual per person health expenditures are about twice what anyone else spends. That actually understates the difference, as our 45 million uninsured citizens have radically restricted access to care, and so the spending on the median insured American is actually quite a bit higher. Canada, France, Great Britain, and Germany all cover their entire populations, and they do so for far less money than we spend. Indeed, Canada, whose system is the most costly of the group, spends only 52 percent per capita what we do.
The article is pretty concise, and delivers a relatively damning blow to the health care system in the U.S., and our focus on making money off of sick people:
This makes it hard to move toward a preventive system, as Canada has, because preventive medicine pays less. It makes it hard to address moral-hazard issues wisely, as the French have, because it’s unprofitable to insure diabetics, and less profitable still to make their care essentially free. It makes it hard to institute the cost savings that Great Britain has, because with less money flowing into the system, there would be far less profit to be made. It makes it hard to harness market forces while protecting against individual risk, as Germany has, because insurer business models are predicated on shifting risk to employers and individuals, and profits are made when insurers can keep that risk from being shifted back onto them. And it is impossible to implement the practices that have so improved the VHA, because doing so would require a single, coherent health system that stuck with its members through their life cycles rather than an endlessly fractured structure in which insurers pawn off their members as they grow old, ill, or unemployed.
Quinn Martin
I said it before, and I’ll say it again.
Single Payer Health Care.
We have a “socialized” Highway System that works. We can have a “socialized” medical care system that works.
Quinn
MDR
Socialized highway system barely works…
But you seem to ignore consistently how poorly the systems work. Healthcare is meted out and many do not receive the care they need; so many from all over the world come to the US to get health care they need and can’t obtain in their own country’s socialized health care.
Incidents of malpractice are at least 18% higher in the best of these systems and the average is more than 50%.
Costs are much higher as well becuase tax rates are higher to pay for the systems. I have friends here in Silver City from Canada, over 20, that hate the execution of the idea; empty beds and so on.
And medicine is only sometimes cheaper; it is heavily subsidized by taxpayer money so the real cost is not cheaper. Take medical marijuana; cost to the user is 1500% over the cost to the government…