The N.S.A., which has run the program of surveillance without warrants since Mr. Bush secretly approved it in October 2001, is known to have used broad pattern analysis in tracking terrorist communications and identifying possible terrorists.
But senior lawmakers said they were still uncertain Wednesday, even after the administration’s announcement, about how the court would go about approving warrants, how targets would be identified, and whether that process would differ from the court’s practices since 1978.
The administration said it had briefed the full House and Senate Intelligence Committees in closed sessions on its decision.
But Representative Heather A. Wilson, Republican of New Mexico, who serves on the Intelligence committee, disputed that, and some Congressional aides said staff members were briefed Friday without lawmakers present.
Ms. Wilson, who has scrutinized the program for the last year, said she believed the new approach relied on a blanket, “programmatic†approval of the president’s surveillance program, rather than approval of individual warrants.
Administration officials “have convinced a single judge in a secret session, in a nonadversarial session, to issue a court order to cover the president’s terrorism surveillance program,†Ms. Wilson said in a telephone interview. She said Congress needed to investigate further to determine how the program is run.
NY Times: Wilson breaking with Bush again?
Linkage:
Via Josh at TPM.
Related Articles
‘Minibus’ Budget Bill Passes the House
A couple of weeks ago we talked about the possibility of Congress rolling the remaining appropriations bills into one package (called an omnibus bill)...
Weeks Before Deadline, Congress Moves to Extend Unemployment Benefits
While the country has experienced an almost unprecedented economic downturn this year, one of the most effective forms of stimulus has been unemployment...
House Office release Office Expense Reports
In a new (and welcomed) form of disclosure, House members have released a huge document dump containing office expenditures for all 435 representatives....